Which campaign inputs shape the airdrop plan?
The campaign brief sets the objective, reward, audience and distribution method. Those 4 inputs determine what needs to be clarified before participants see an announcement. We review the material your team has, identify missing decisions and turn approved details into a usable campaign specification.
A useful first review covers:
- Objective: the project action or audience need the reward should support.
- Reward: what is offered and how your team will approve allocation.
- Audience: who may participate and any restrictions the project requires.
- Distribution: the intended claim route and the person responsible for it.
- Support: where participants can get help with instructions or eligibility.
This review helps separate a campaign decision from a delivery task. For example, your team approves the reward and participation terms; we can organize those terms into participant-facing copy. The project also remains responsible for token access and movement. If you need the wider channel plan, connect the airdrop to community growth and engagement. If the objective is sustained conversation after distribution, consider community activation campaigns as a separate workstream.
Send the current draft even if some decisions remain open. We can mark each open item, assign an owner and identify what must be settled before outreach begins.
What should participants be able to verify before they join?
The eligibility document should let a participant check the required action, deadline and claim route without guessing. We review the rules against the participant journey, then flag gaps for your team to resolve before publication. Clear terms also give moderators a consistent reference when questions arrive.
Check that the campaign materials explain these 5 points:
- Which actions qualify, and where each action takes place.
- When participation opens or closes, using dates approved by your team.
- Which regional or other restrictions apply.
- How rewards are assigned and how eligible participants are notified.
- What claim information is required and where support is available.
For repeated submissions or unusual activity, define a review policy before launch. Screening may flag patterns for human review; it cannot establish that every entry represents a unique person. Record how the team will handle disputed decisions, and keep the public wording aligned with that policy. Avoid collecting information that is not needed for participation or delivery.
Where the campaign uses tasks, make each instruction observable and easy to confirm. Quest campaign support can help organize task-based participation. For follow-up questions and ongoing group care, community management and moderation can be scoped alongside the campaign.
How do distribution plans connect to aggregator submissions?
The distribution checklist identifies the reward source, claim route, project owner and verification points. It gives your team a clear view of who must approve each action. We use the approved campaign facts to prepare consistent materials for relevant airdrop aggregators, where outreach is included in scope.
The submission pack can draw on 3 core artifacts: a project description, an eligibility summary and participant instructions. It can also include official destination links and campaign dates supplied by your team. Before anything is sent, compare each detail with the approved campaign page and community announcements. A mismatch between claim instructions and outreach copy creates avoidable participant confusion.
Your team retains control of token allocation, account access and any required contracts. We coordinate the agreed preparation and outreach; we do not take custody of project funds. If Telegram is part of the audience plan, Telegram community growth can support the channel work. For a task-led format, use quest campaigns to keep instructions and actions in one plan.
Treat aggregator outreach as a way to present accurate campaign information. It does not replace a ready claim journey, clear terms or a support contact.
What does the project receive for review and handoff?
The delivery record gives your team an auditable account of the agreed work. Before outreach starts, an account lead reviews the eligibility rules, participant flow and campaign information with your team. You approve the final terms and project claims; we prepare and coordinate the materials covered by the scope.
Depending on the agreed work, the handoff can include:
- Campaign brief: objective, audience, reward conditions and responsibilities.
- Eligibility review: unclear wording and unresolved decisions flagged for approval.
- Distribution checklist: inputs, owners and verification points.
- Campaign copy: participant guidance and a consistent information set for outreach.
- Delivery record: completed materials and outreach actions, with open items noted.
Use the handoff to check whether each public instruction matches the approved terms. Confirm that official links lead to the intended project resources. Name a contact who can answer participant questions. These checks give your team a practical reference during the campaign and help clarify which decisions still belong to the project.
If the project also needs a planned prize promotion, compare the scope with giveaways and contests. For other community work, community growth and engagement provides the broader service context.
Which checkpoints move an airdrop from brief to outreach?
The project moves through 5 checkpoints: brief, rule review, material approval, agreed outreach and delivery review. The sequence makes dependencies visible before a launch window is treated as workable. Timing is agreed after we understand the claim method, required approvals and outreach scope.
- Share the objective, reward outline, chain, audience and intended launch window.
- Review eligibility, participant instructions, restrictions and support ownership.
- Confirm distribution responsibilities and approve campaign materials.
- Coordinate the aggregator outreach and related announcements included in scope.
- Review the delivery record and assign any remaining project decisions.
At each checkpoint, we separate completed work from pending input. Your team should provide the approved terms, official links and a named approver before materials are finalized. If a distribution decision is unresolved, we record it rather than treating it as approved. This keeps the schedule tied to actual readiness instead of an assumed launch date.
For a fuller planning reference, see how to plan an airdrop campaign. Send the brief, current rules and preferred distribution method to start scoping. GeoMarketing Experts will review those inputs and return a defined work scope and next decision list.
What can an aggregator decide after you submit campaign details?
Aggregator review, acceptance, display and timing remain decisions made by each platform. We can prepare and coordinate the agreed submissions, but cannot promise publication or a particular participant response. Your project remains responsible for approving token movement and ensuring the claim route is ready before participants are directed to it.
Use the campaign objective to decide whether an airdrop is the right format. If the priority is participant education, make the required action useful and explain how it connects to the product. If the priority is ongoing discussion and support, add a separate community scope rather than making reward eligibility carry that work. Airdrop rules, community activity and support responsibilities should remain distinct in the public instructions.
Before approving a submission, check 3 items. Confirm the terms match the latest approved version. Verify every destination link is official. Name a project contact for questions. These checks are within the project’s control. For a complementary channel plan, review community activation campaigns or Telegram community growth.
Send us your reward outline, draft eligibility rules and preferred distribution method. We will identify the unresolved decisions, confirm the outreach scope and prepare the first review materials.
How it works
- Send the project briefShare the objective, reward, chain, audience and intended launch window. Include any existing rules and participant instructions.
- Review eligibility and distributionWe check how participants qualify, how the claim route works and which decisions need project approval.
- Approve campaign materialsYour team confirms the final terms, participant guidance, official links and outreach copy.
- Coordinate the agreed outreachWe carry out the scoped aggregator work and record completed actions for your review.
- Review the delivery recordYou receive a clear account of completed work and open items that need a project-side decision.
Frequently asked questions
What should we send before you scope an airdrop?
Send the objective, reward outline, chain, intended audience and preferred distribution method. Include draft eligibility terms, the claim journey and any participation restrictions. A short list of open decisions is useful too. We use those inputs to prepare a review checklist and identify what your team must approve before campaign materials can be finalized.
How do you handle repeated entries in an airdrop?
We help define a consistent review policy before participation opens. Your team can review repeated submissions or unusual patterns and document how it handles decisions. Screening can flag activity for human review, but it does not prove that every eligible entry belongs to a unique person. Keep that distinction clear in participant-facing materials.
Can your team prepare aggregator submissions for us?
Yes. The agreed scope can include preparing campaign information and coordinating outreach to relevant airdrop aggregators. We work from the approved project description, eligibility summary, official links and participant instructions. The delivery record notes the agreed actions completed, while the aggregator controls its own review and presentation.
Can Telegram activity count toward airdrop eligibility?
It can when the action supports the campaign objective and the rules explain how completion is reviewed. Specify the relevant Telegram activity, where participants complete it and how questions are handled. A Telegram action should not replace useful product context if the campaign aims to introduce participants to the project.
How do you set a workable preparation schedule?
We set the schedule after reviewing the claim method, eligibility terms, approvals and aggregator outreach scope. Your team’s approved reward details and official links are key inputs. The checkpoint list records which items are complete and which remain open, so a launch window follows actual readiness rather than an assumed date.
Can you confirm an aggregator will publish our airdrop?
No. Each aggregator controls whether it reviews or accepts a submission, how it presents information and when it does so. We can prepare the agreed materials and document completed outreach, but publication and participant response are not within our control. The scope defines the work delivered, not a platform decision.
Tell us about your project
Answer four quick questions and a manager will send you a plan, timing and a price range within the hour. Everything stays confidential.
Loading the form…